In the evolving landscape of corporate governance and financial reporting, the role of the external auditor has never been more critical. Recent concerns regarding the independence of auditing firms, especially in relation to the provision of auditing versus consulting services, have intensified the scrutiny on auditor selection and rotation practices.
In Australia, the rotation of external auditors is governed by a mix of legislation, ethical standards, and professional guidelines designed to enhance auditor independence and audit quality. According to CPA Australia and the Corporations Act, the primary objective of auditor rotation is to promote auditor independence.
Specifically, the Corporations Act stipulates that an individual may not play a significant role in the audit of a listed entity for more than five out of seven successive financial years. This applies to roles such as the lead auditor, the review auditor, and a registered company auditor appointed as the auditor of the audited body. The intention behind this rule is to mitigate risks associated with long-term auditor-client relationships, that might compromise the auditor’s objectivity and independence.
Key Concerns with External Audits
External audits are essential for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of a company’s financial reporting. However, concerns have arisen regarding auditor independence, conflicts of interest, and the potential for complacency, particularly when auditors maintain long-term relationships with their clients.
The debate around auditing and consulting services provided by the same firm has highlighted the risk of compromising auditor objectivity, leading to calls for stricter separation of these services.
Pros and Cons of Rotation of External Auditors
The rotation of external auditors is a practice with significant implications for audit quality and corporate governance. Below are some key pros and cons associated with this process:
Pros:
- Enhances auditor independence and objectivity.
- Provides fresh perspectives on the financial reporting process.
- Mitigates the risk of over-familiarity between auditors and management.
Cons:
- Transition periods can lead to increased costs and resource demands.
- Loss of institutional knowledge accumulated by the outgoing auditor.
- Potential disruption to the financial reporting cycle.
All these issues need to be carefully considered by companies looking for a new external auditor.
Key Considerations When Choosing an External Auditor
Selecting an external auditor involves more than evaluating technical competence.
Businesses must consider the auditor’s understanding of the industry, their approach to risk and compliance, the quality of their communication and reporting, and their reputation within the market.
Additionally, the potential for added value through insights and recommendations should be weighed alongside costs.
The Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD), in conjunction with the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AAASB), has developed a “Periodic Comprehensive Review of the External Auditor – Guide for Audit Committees.”
This initiative aims to improve audit quality by providing a framework for audit committees to assess the performance and effectiveness of their external auditors, emphasising the importance of regular and thorough reviews to maintain high standards of auditing practice.
Preparing for a New External Auditor
Transitioning to a new external auditor involves careful planning to ensure a smooth and effective changeover. This process begins with establishing a comprehensive handover procedure, which is pivotal for transferring essential knowledge from the outgoing auditor to the incoming one. Such a procedure might include detailed documentation of audit history, significant accounting policies, prior year’s adjustments, and any unresolved issues.
Aligning expectations is another crucial step, involving clear communication between the company and its new auditor about the audit plan, timelines, deliverables, and the preferred formats for reporting. This ensures both parties are on the same page regarding how the audit will be conducted and what outcomes are expected.
Lastly, the company may need to review and adjust its internal processes. This is to accommodate the new auditor’s methodologies, which could involve different approaches to sampling, testing, or risk assessment. Adapting to these new methodologies might require updates to internal controls, financial systems, or documentation practices to meet the specific requirements and standards of the new auditor. This step is essential for minimizing disruptions and facilitating a more efficient and effective audit process.
What to Expect When a New External Auditor is Appointed
The appointment of a new external auditor often brings a period of adjustment as the new audit firm familiarises itself with the business and its financial practices. Key areas of focus will include:
Thorough Reviews: New auditors will conduct in-depth examinations of financial records, systems, and controls to fully understand the business’s financial and related practices.
Insight Generation: This process may uncover areas where risk management strategies can be improved or operational efficiencies can be enhanced, leading to valuable recommendations for the company.
Adaptation: Both the auditor and the company may need to adapt to each other’s working styles and expectations to ensure a smooth and productive audit process.
External Auditors: Managing Opportunities and Risks
For external auditors, the rotation process presents both opportunities and risks.
Opportunities include the potential to engage with new clients and apply fresh approaches to auditing practices.
Conversely, the risk of losing clients due to mandatory rotation policies or competitive pressures necessitates a focus on delivering value, maintaining high standards of audit quality, and demonstrating independence and objectivity.
What about internal rotation of auditor?
Changing the external auditor within the same audit firm, often referred to as “internal rotation,” is viewed as a measure to safeguard auditor independence and mitigate risks associated with prolonged auditor-client relationships.
In principle, internal rotation can help refresh the audit approach and perspective within the ongoing audit firm-client relationship, addressing concerns related to auditor familiarity and complacency. By rotating audit partners or key audit team members, firms can introduce a new set of eyes on the audit process, potentially enhancing audit quality and maintaining a critical level of independence and objectivity.
However, internal rotation might not go far enough in addressing the underlying concerns that prompt the need for rotation in the first place. Critics suggest that changing auditors within the same firm may not completely eliminate the risk of developing too close a relationship with the client or fully prevent the potential for audit quality to be compromised over time. This is because the overarching culture, methodologies, and business interests of the audit firm remain constant, even as individual auditors change.
Where to from here?
The decision to change an external auditor is significant and requires careful consideration of a range of factors, from audit quality and independence to the practicalities of transition and the potential for new insights and improvements in financial reporting.
For businesses in Australia, adhering to local standards and guidelines, such as those promoted by the AICD and AAASB, is essential.
Meanwhile, external auditors must navigate the balance between potential new opportunities and mitigating the risks of client turnover, at the same time focusing on high standards of professionalism and integrity in their work.
National Audits Group are specialists in navigating the rules associated with the management and auditing of business financial statements. The days are gone where generalists can effectively advise audit clients. A broad range of experience and skills is required to provide the best advice.
To discuss how National Audits Group can help your business, contact our team at Ph 1300 734 707.
Steven Watson, Director, National Audits Group | www.audits.com.au
As Managing Director of National Audits Group, Steven provides assurance and advisory services to all types of entities in a diverse range of industries. His team has an enduring commitment to efficient, quality and value of auditing services.
